Accountable, authorized or authentic? What do ‘faith representatives’ offer urban governance?

Rachael Chapman, Vivien Lowndes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)


Non-elected faith representatives are increasingly involved in public policy decisionmaking. Yet, little is understood about who they represent and on what basis. Drawing on political theory and primary research data, this article examines what, in democratic terms, is going on when a faith leader sits on a local strategic partnership, a service advisory body, or a neighbourhood board. It shows that, despite very real limitations, faith representatives complement traditional electoral representation by bringing new and ‘authentic’ voices and expertise. ‘Representative claims’ are legitimized in part through faith leaders' involvement in dense (and often marginalized) community networks, but also through their very ‘untaintedness’ in relation to traditional electoral processes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)371-378
JournalPublic Money & Management
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2009


Dive into the research topics of 'Accountable, authorized or authentic? What do ‘faith representatives’ offer urban governance?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this