Designing in highly contentious areas: Perspectives on a way forward for mental healthcare transformation

Daniela Sangiorgi, Michelle Farr, Sarah McAllister, Gillian Mulvale, Martha Sneyd, Josina Vink, Laura Warwick

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
40 Downloads (Pure)


There is growing interest in service design to support transformation in mental healthcare. Early research in this area has shown some promising results, but has also revealed the contentious nature of this work. A better understanding of the complexity of design in mental health is needed to support the development of approaches that are appropriate for this context. As such, the aim of this paper is to examine areas of contention and related strategies employed when designing for mental health transformation. To realize this aim, a qualitative multiple case study of ten service design initiatives in mental health contexts was conducted. The analysis revealed five interconnected contentious issues: organizational constraints; ensuring meaningful participation; culture clashes; power dynamics; and systems approaches. These contentious issues are detailed and related strategies from various cases are put forward, providing a rich foundation for the ongoing development of service design approaches in mental health.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)309-330
Number of pages22
JournalThe Design Journal
Issue numbersup1
Early online date31 May 2019
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Event13th International Conference of the European Academy of Design: Running with Scissors - Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
Duration: 10 Apr 201912 Apr 2019
Conference number: 13


Dive into the research topics of 'Designing in highly contentious areas: Perspectives on a way forward for mental healthcare transformation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this