Framing health inequalities for local intervention: comparative case studies

Tim Blackman, Barbara Harrington, Eva Elliott, Alex Greene, David J. Hunter, Linda Marks, Lorna McKee, Gareth Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)


This article explores how health inequalities are constructed as an object for policy intervention by considering four framings: politics, audit, evidence and treatment. A thematic analysis of 197 interviews conducted with local managers in England, Scotland and Wales is used to explore how these framings emerge from local narratives. The three different national policy regimes create contrasting contexts, especially regarding the different degrees of emphasis in these regimes on audit and performance management. We find that politics dominates how health inequalities are framed for intervention, affecting their prioritisation in practice and how audit, evidence and treatment are described as deployed in local strategies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-63
JournalSociology of Health and Illness
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2011


Dive into the research topics of 'Framing health inequalities for local intervention: comparative case studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this