How the Business Model of Customisable Card Games Influences Player Engagement

Victoria Hodge, Nick Sephton, Sam Devlin, Peter Cowling, Nikolaos Goumagias, Jianhua Shao, Kieran Purvis, Ignazio Cabras, Kiran Fernandes, Feng Li

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)
    30 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In this article, we analyse the game play data of three popular customisable card games where players build decks prior to game play. We analyse the data from a player engagement perspective, how the business model affects players, how players influence the business model and provide strategic insights for players themselves. Sifa et al. found a lack of crossgame analytics while Marchand and Hennig-Thurau identified a lack of understanding of how a game’s business model and strategies affect players. We address both issues. The three games have similar business models but differ in one aspect: the distribution model for the cards used in the game. Our longitudinal analysis highlights this variation’s impact. A uniform distribution creates a spread of decks with slowly emerging trends while a random distribution creates stripes of deck building activity that switch suddenly each update. Our method is simple, easily understandable, independent of the specific game’s structure and able to compare multiple games. It is applicable to games that release updates and enables comparison across games. Optimising a game’s updates strategy is key as it affects player engagement and retention which directly influence businesses’ revenues and profitability in the $95 billion global games market.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)374-385
    Number of pages12
    JournalIEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games
    Volume11
    Issue number4
    Early online date12 Mar 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 23 Dec 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How the Business Model of Customisable Card Games Influences Player Engagement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this