Practices, Governance, and Politics: Applying MacIntyre's Ethics to Business

Matthew Sinnicks

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    23 Citations (Scopus)
    4 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This paper argues that attempts to apply Alasdair MacIntyre’s positive moral theory to business ethics are problematic, due to the cognitive closure of MacIntyre’s concept of a practice. I begin by outlining the notion of a practice, before turning to Moore’s attempt to provide a MacIntyrean account of corporate governance. I argue that Moore’s attempt is mismatched with MacIntyre’s account of moral education. Because the notion of practices resists general application I go on to argue that a negative application, which focuses on regulation, is more plausible. Large-scale regulation, usually thought antithetical to MacIntyre’s advocacy of small-scale politics, has the potential to facilitate practice-based work and reveals that MacIntyre’s own work can be used against his pessimism about the modern order. Furthermore, the conception of regulation I defend can show us how management is more amenable to ethical understanding than MacIntyre’s work is often taken to imply.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)229-249
    Number of pages21
    JournalBusiness Ethics Quarterly
    Volume24
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Practices, Governance, and Politics: Applying MacIntyre's Ethics to Business'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this