Review of the literature on board committees: taking stock and looking ahead

Szymon Kaczmarek, Richard Nyuur

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)
    4 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Committees on a board of directors are now subject to recommendations by regulations in practically all jurisdictions. At the same time, scholarly work on the topic has escalated since the mid-1990s. In this review article, we examine relevant literature on board committees of audit, compensation and nomination, as part of corporate governance research in general, over the period of 1988 to 2011. We observed an exponential growth in contributions over time, the majority of which can be attributed to management and accounting scholars. The audit committee is the most researched of all three committees, with the nomination committee being the least researched. An analysis of the literature generated a picture that included the following features: 1) the dominance of the agency theory; 2) a lack of other unifying theoretical frameworks; 3) a strong US-centrism; 4) the prevalence of quantitative research methods.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)89
    JournalInternational Journal of Business Governance and Ethics
    Volume11
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Review of the literature on board committees: taking stock and looking ahead'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this