The Mechanisms of Implementation Support - Findings from a Systematic Integrative Review

Bianca Albers*, Allison Metz, Katie Burke, Leah Bührmann, Leah Bartley, Pia Driessen, Cecilie Varsi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)


Purpose: Mechanisms of Change (MoC) explain how strategies used to enhance the uptake of evidence in social and human services enable change in the behaviors of individual practitioners, organizational leaders or entire organizations, and systems. One such strategy is the use of implementation support practitioner (ISPs). This study examines the mechanisms through which ISPs facilitate behavior supportive of the implementation of research-supported interventions. Methods: A systematic, integrative review was conducted. The conceptualization of MoCs built on a model by Dalkin and colleagues. Results: Based on a unique combination of knowledge, skills, and attitudes, ISPs install trust in and among their stakeholders and utilize this trust to promote meaningful and relevant learning; provide ongoing opportunities for learning, reflection, and support; help to span boundaries; and positively motivate stakeholders. Discussion: ISPs do not represent a short cut to better implementation. They represent an additional implementation challenge that requires dedicated attention and resources.
Original languageEnglish
Article number104973152110423
Pages (from-to)259-280
Number of pages22
JournalResearch on Social Work Practice
Issue number3
Early online date23 Nov 2021
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2022


Dive into the research topics of 'The Mechanisms of Implementation Support - Findings from a Systematic Integrative Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this